All case studies

Northern Michigan

Client campaign 路 10,341 cards 路 May 2026

375 calls from one 10,341-card land campaign

3.6%

response on 10,341 cards. His text: "made our phone ring 375 times."

The setup

  • One order, mailed in May 2026: 10,341 handwritten cards to land owners in northern Michigan.
  • Vacant-land owners are the hardest cold audience in real estate mail: absentee, mailed constantly, and rarely emotionally attached to the parcel.
  • The client texted us the results himself a few weeks after the drop.

The numbers

375

phone calls from one drop

3.6%

response rate, client-reported

10,341

cards in the campaign

$45,000

potential deal in play at the time of his text

Client text reporting 375 calls and 3.6 percent response from a 10,341-card campaign
The client's text, a few weeks after the drop.

What happened

His message, verbatim: my order on 5/13 for 10,341 cards made our phone ring 375 times. 3.6% response. 1 deal purchased so far. Potentially a $45,000 deal.

This is the most recent large campaign in our tracked set, and it ran at roughly seven times the response of a typical printed land mailer.

One campaign is one campaign. We publish it next to our worst tracked result, 0.86%, because a best case only means something beside the floor.

Ten thousand cards, three hundred seventy-five rings. When the phone is the metric, the handwriting pays for itself.

These are real customer-reported numbers from tracked campaign records. One campaign on one list is one campaign: your list and your market decide your results, and nobody honest promises a rate before seeing either.

Run this test on your own list.

Already mailing with someone else? Split-test us against them.

Start your campaign

Next: 5.4x the response of printed mail